HERITAGE • CONSERVATION • ENVIRONMENT • WILDLIFE • LEISURE

Quicklinks SUBSCRIBE to our eNEWS Discounts for members Food and drink HS2 Focus on north Chilterns News Our magazineChiltern magazine

PGS: Telecom masts

The Society's remit is limited to considering the aesthetic impact of masts on the character of the Chilterns and its settlements.

Comments on proposals will be most effective if they have regard to national planning guidance as set out in National Planning Policy Framework paras 42-46. This requires, amongst other things, that:

“Local planning authorities should support the expansion of electronic communications networks” …. but “aim to keep the numbers of. …. masts and sites.… to a minimum consistent with the efficient operation of the network.”

“Existing masts, buildings and other structures should be used, unless the need for a new site has been justified. Where new sites are required, equipment should be sympathetically designed and camouflaged where appropriate.”

“Applications… (including for prior approval)….should be supported by…. evidence of consultations with organisations with an interest in the proposed development”; …. and evidence “that the applicant has explored the possibility of erecting antennas on an existing building, mast or other structure…. and that” radiation “guidelines will be met.”

“Local planning authorities must determine applications on planning grounds. They should not seek to prevent competition between different operators, question the need for the telecommunications system, or determine health safeguards if the proposal meets International Commission guidelines for public exposure.”

Not all masts and antennas require planning permission, falling into 3 categories:

For the latter two categories of application, Planning Field Officers may wish to comment on matters of appearance and siting.

Factors to be considered relating to the appearance of masts and ancillary apparatus might include materials, colour and design. The use of appropriate materials and colour may allow a mast to blend more easily into its surroundings. Features of design which PFOs may wish to consider include dimensions; overall shape; and whether the construction is solid or forms an open framework.

Factors to consider relating to siting might include:

In considering the siting and appearance of a mast together with its associated development, the scope for landscaping and screening to reduce the impact of the development on its surroundings will be an important consideration.

Society Planning Field Officers should consider whether in their opinion these factors have been adequately taken into account in each case and whether the applicant has provided evidence of having considered alternative sites including existing structures or a shared site. Operators' licences already require them to remove installations when no longer needed.
PFO's would do well to familiarise themselves with available designs of masts, details of which can reasonably be requested from operators making applications. It will be useful to find out the views of other interested parties (eg., the Parish Council and CPRE), although their criteria may not be precisely the same as those of the Society.

Other opportunities to influence telecommunication plans may arise as follows:

In summary, Society policy is to oppose the siting of masts where they would spoil the view of residents of the Chilterns or users of the Chilterns countryside, particularly those using footpaths.

Revised September 2013 by MikeChadwick

 

‹ back to Guidance Statements list

The Chiltern Society Planning Group monitors all parishes in the Chilterns.